Darl's Inverse Apotheosis And Why The Bundrens Are a Bunch Of Goofy Goobers
I think that Faulkner portrays the cast of “As I Lay Dying” as a bunch of goobers, because the entire story is almost like an inversion of the Hero’s Journey, instead of ascending from normal life into a state of enlightenment or self-fulfillment, or a finding of one’s identity like the stories of Siddhartha or Helga Crane, we see the Bundrens descend into a lower plane of existence, devolving into absurdity, or in Darl’s case, literal insanity. One thread of this overarching theme throughout the novel is Darl’s descent into madness. In the early chapters of the book, Darl’s POV tends to be very matter-of-fact, giving vivid imagery and descriptions of events; some of which he did not even attend. This semi-omniscience we see from Darl gives the impression that the is the “Narrator” of the story, whose thoughts would provide clarity among Faulkner’s often hard-to-read sections from other character’s POVs. In Darl’s 2nd chapter on pages 10-11, we see examples of his narrator-like descriptions of events. “Pa and Vernon are sitting on the back porch… I fling the dipper dregs to the ground and wipe my mouth on my sleeve.” Many of his early chapters are similarly clear, describe directly actions taken by characters and the events which occur; more or less similar in writing to other books.
However, as the book goes on, Darl becomes less and less clear, being written more like the other characters; he rambles a lot more and becomes generally more unintelligible. In one of his chapters towards the middle of the book, Darl says “Jewel knows he is, because he does not know that he does not know where he is or not”. Here, he contemplates consciousness and existence in a sort of “I think therefore I am” manner, and deduces that Jewel exists because he doesn’t bother to think about such things as his existence. In doing so, he himself contemplates his existence and thus doesn’t exist according to his conclusion. This shows how his character progressively become less and less intelligible as the book goes on, as the rest of that chapter is full of similar ponderings which don’t really make sense when you first read them, such as “...he is not what he is and he is what he is not.”
The final moment in Darl’s descent into madness, and in my opinion, one of the most striking images, is as Darl watches the scene unfold after he’s set the barn ablaze. The narrative tone of this chapter depersonalizes Darl’s perspective, turning him into a kind of 3rd person omniscient narrator. The chapter contains only vivid, factual descriptions of what’s going on, what people are saying, descriptions of the scene as Jewel rushes into the burning barn to save the animals, as Darl just stands and watches. This gives the reader an ominous vibe from Darl’s presence. Darl interjects with his opinion; “The sound of it has become quite peaceful once.” This coupled with him ominously standing watching the barn burn down was a really striking image for me, and it does a really good job of capturing how much of a psycho masochist Darl has become; the moment seems like a moment of apotheosis like when Siddhartha finally reaches enlightenment, but in an odd perversion of the hero’s journey, where Darl reaches “endarkenment” for lack of a better world,
I find it very interesting that we see Darl going crazy through his own eyes, the whole story feels like a fever dream as you’re reading it, and the vast majority of what we know about the characters is through Darl’s eyes and is thus distorted by his own biases and what he’s thinking. It’s even stranger that Darl can see through space and time and just know things omnisciently; perhaps you could hypothesize that none of the story happened and it’s all inside Darl’s head as he slowly loses his sanity
Great post, Inniyew. What really sells Darl's "endarkenment", as you put it, is the rest of the family's reaction (or lack thereof) to Darl. I guess Vardaman did his usual confused response, but Cash's and Anse's reactions in particular are very matter-of-fact. Yep, he went crazy, oh well. It's as if they saw it coming or expected it, somehow. Yet another example of the goober-ness of the Bundrens.
ReplyDeleteBigly stated. Because Darl is our main narrator for the book, and we end up trusting his word more than the other "insane" family members, we don't really notice his descent into madness until it's too late. All the other family members' narrations are so unhinged sometimes that when Darl does a bit of it too we're almost desensitized to it, and don't notice the significance of it coming from Darl. I think it kind of shows how inherently absurd the journey the Bundrens are going on is that beginning-of-the-novel-Darl just starts laughing like the Joker when they depart. Eventually it rubs off on him enough that he goes over the edge.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I think you captured the contrast of the hero’s journey in Siddhartha, Quicksand, and As I Lay Dying perfectly. As I Lay Dying is like some sort of “anti” hero’s journey, and Darl’s “hero’s journey” is a great example of that. Siddhartha’s journey was a much more typical hero’s journey where he reached enlightenment and, as you described, ascended from normal life. While Helga doesn’t experience exactly the same thing, she reaches her own enlightenment, which leads to tragedy. However, Darl’s development is like a failed hero’s journey where he completely loses himself rather than finding himself through his journey. It’s really interesting how these three books compare when you think about it.
ReplyDeleteThe idea of Darl's Anti-Hero's Journey seems to be the most clear-cut way to interpret this as a Hero's Journey. Maybe in Darl's mind, what he's doing really is an apotheosis, and getting sent off to Jackson is some sort of boon, proof of his "achievement" of insanity. As for your idea of the entire story being in Darl's mind...no. It's way more fun to think of them as fictional people made up by a non-fictional person, rather than fictional people made up by a fictional person.
ReplyDelete